The latest statistics for 2025 show that Chinas environmental protection equipment imports exceeded $32 billion, covering 12 major categories including water treatment equipment and air purification devices. Importing companies commonly face the following key issues:
Commodity classification disputes:The HS code discrepancy rate for identical equipment at different ports reaches as high as 27%
Technical standard conflicts:The mismatch between EU CE certification and domestic energy efficiency standards is particularly prominent
Document validity risks:The average processing time for import licenses has extended by 15 working days compared to 2020
Key Node Analysis of the Entire Import Process
Taking the import of typical sewage treatment equipment as an example, the complete process includes 8 stages:
Pre - classification stage
Collection of equipment technical parameters (flow rate, treatment process, etc.)
Determining declaration elements by referencing the 2025 edition of theimport and exportCustoms Tariff
Market access approval stage
Filing for used electromechanical product imports (requires application 90 days in advance)
Emergency response experienceImport return case processing cycle should be controlled within 45 days
Tax planning capabilityProper utilization of free trade agreement tariff preferences (up to 15% reduction)
Customs system integrationSupports direct data connection with the Customs Single Window
Industry compliance databaseReal-time updates of environmental equipment import restriction lists
Case study: Analysis of customs clearance obstacles for a German companys air purification equipment
In March 2025, a Suzhou-based company importing industrial-grade air purification systems worth 1.2 million euros encountered classification disputes:
Key dispute points:Whether the built-in sensors constitute independent functional units
Solution:The agent provided original German design drawings, successfully proving the sensors were merely auxiliary components
Result comparison:After classification correction, the tariff difference reached 87,000 yuan, with 23,000 yuan saved in late declaration fees
Optimization strategies for import cost structure
Basic cost control:Agent service fees should be maintained within 0.6%-1.2% of the cargo value
Hidden cost avoidance:
Container demurrage fees (port policy differences can reach 300 yuan/day)
Technical rectification costs (recommend reserving 3% of cargo value as emergency budget)
Tax incentive policies:
Catalog of Major Technical Equipment Imports (eligible for tariff reduction)
Tax exemption policy for scientific and educational supplies (applicable to R&D equipment)
Choose professionalImport RepresentationWhen selecting agents, focus on evaluating their industry case database size (recommended minimum 50 successful cases), stability of customs team (core members should have over 5 years of experience), and systematic solution capabilities. High-quality agents can improve customs clearance efficiency by 40% and reduce overall costs by 12%-18%.